Saltear al contenido principal

Legal Ban Mean

The Indo-European etymology of the Germanic term is derived from a root *bha-, meaning «to speak». Its original meaning was magical and referred to utterances that carried a curse power. A ban is a formal or informal prohibition[1] of something. Prohibitions are formed for the prohibition of activities in a certain political territory. Some trade bans are called embargoes. Ban is also used as a verb similar to «prohibit». It finally comes from the Old English bannan, which means «to summon or proclaim». It also has influences from the Old Norse Banna, which means «to curse», which more closely reflects the modern use of prohibition. The verb to prohibit means to prohibit or to do something. The word can also be used as a noun. A school board could ban all books related to Jefferson`s mistress if it doesn`t want someone to read them.

In common English usage, prohibition is usually synonymous with prohibition. Historically, Old English (ge)bann is a derivation of the verb bannan «summon, command, proclaim» from an earlier Germanic *bannan «to command, forbid, banish, curse». The modern meaning of «prohibit» is influenced by the Old Norse banna «curse, forbid» and also by the Old French prohibition, finally a borrowing from Old Frankish, which means «ostracism, banishment». [1] Imperial prohibition was a form of ostracism in the Holy Roman Empire. At various times it could be declared by the Holy Roman Emperor, by courts such as the Vehmgericht (pronounced [féːmgəʀɪχt]) and the Reichskammergericht or by the Reichstag. People in imperial exile lose all their rights and property, and everyone has the right to rob, injure or kill these people without legal consequences. The imperial prohibition automatically followed a person`s excommunication and extended to anyone offering assistance to a person under the imperial prohibition. 12. 3 During the apartheid regime in South Africa, the National Party government issued prohibition orders to people who were considered a threat to their power – often black politicians or organisations – these prohibition orders acted as repressive orders.

Individuals or organizations and critical media banned by the 1950 Law on the Suppression of Communism (which effectively defined «communism» as opposition to the government) could not at any time communicate with more than one person unless they were at home (thus preventing them from engaging in political activities), travelling outside the district of a particular magistrate without government authorization. The decree mainly had domestic policy effects with a versatile legal formative effect. These include, for example, local or supra-regional residence restrictions, bans on public expression, bans on printed publications, and bans on quoting the writings of the persons concerned or on participating in meetings in journalistic or scientific contexts. Such measures could also apply to groups of individuals, organizations (e.g., Southern Africa Defence Fund, 1966) and institutions (e.g., Christian Institute, 1977). Several laws have legalized such actions (Agitated Assemblies Act 1914 and later 1956, Illegal Organizations Act 1960, Suppression of Communism (Amendment) Act, 1977 Internal Security Act, 1982 and 1986). Act No. 76 of 1962 amending the General Act empowers the Minister of Justice to publish prohibited persons in the Official Gazette. Helen Suzman, a liberal member of the South African parliament, defended the right to freedom of assembly and expression for all citizens in 1986, highlighting the growing confrontation between the black population and the police.

[5] [6] Note: The Middle English name can also continue Old English, giving «edict, proclamation, command», a derivative of gebbanan, similar to the meaning of bannan without a prefix. The negative meanings «prohibition, condemnation», etc., although already present to some extent in Latin of the early Middle Ages, appear in English (or French) only in the sixteenth century and are partly derived from the verb prohibition entry 1. The Germanic etymon appears in Latin as bannus (or bannum), from the sixth century in the Historia Francorum of Gregory of Tours, and from the seventh century in the Lex Ripuaria, the laws of the Ripuarian Franks; the word Latin has developed a wide range of meanings (compare entries in J.F. Niermeyer, Mediae Latinitatis lexicon minus and Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources). The ban on ringing church bells, lifted in 1941, was reintroduced.

Volver arriba